Category Archives: For Photographers

NEWS: WEBSITE UPDATED

Just finished updating my website with lots of new images and improved design elements. I believe in keeping things simple when showcasing images online and let the images do the talking rather than overload your senses with other webpage gimmicks. Having said this, I think the new design is an overall improvement for the viewer. I’ve moved away from the overall dark red throughout the website keeping it mostly just to the homepage and created cleaner looking galleries. Well, that was my goal anyway. To see for yourself, click on this link.

Let me know what you all think. It’d would be great to have some honest feedback. And of course if some links or things just don’t work.

Cheers,
Philip

WEDDING: CLAUDIA AND TRAVIS

LAST SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21 2009, CLAUDIA AND TRAVIS TIED THE KNOT AT SAN FERNANDO CATHEDRAL with their reception following at Southwest School of Art and Craft. I first met Claudia and Travis back in August 2008, so I know the planning process has been rather drawn out for them as they secured the locations they really wanted. Both are a delightful couple and I wish them all the happiness. Right now, they’re both enjoying their honeymoon on a Holland America cruise ship somewhere in the Caribbean-I’m so envious.

Below are a few of my favorites from their one special day.

For anyone interested, I used a Nikon D3, D700, a Nikon 14-24 f2.8, 35mm f2 and 50mm f1.4 lens. I’m selling my 24-70 f2.8 lens this week and purchasing my last lens for a while, a 85mm f1,4, completing my transition to prime lenses. As much as I love my Nikon zoom, I just don’t use it anymore.


January 19, 2010 - 1:21 pm Philip Thomas - Hi Juanita, Thank you for your comment. As I already replied to you on December 28, you need to contact Claudia or Travis for access. They are the folks who allow friends and family to view them. You may be able to access them via this link: http://www.pictage.com/client/event.do?event=750569 Hoep this helps. Warm regards, Philip

January 19, 2010 - 1:06 pm Juanita Luensmann - I am ready to buy my pictures but can not get the right web site

San Antonio Weddings Publishes Article About Top 10 Image In Brides Magazine/WPJA Competition

San Antonio Weddings were very kind to write an article about my top 10 Brides Magazine photo. Check the full article out here.

Screen shot 2009-10-27 at 10.39.42 AM

Top Ten Image Winner For 2009 Brides Magazine/WPJA Contest

I’m excited and humbled to share news with you that I received a top ten image (actually scored 9th) for the 2009 Brides Magazine competition in the ‘Parents’ Category. This is the third annual wedding photojournalism contest in collaboration with Brides magazine and the WPJA-Wedding Photojournalist Association. The international contest is open to only WPJA members, of which I’m honored to be a member.

Happy times. Here’s the link to Bridal Magazine’s 1st place winners and the rest of the runner ups can be found here.

JUDGES COMMENTS  ”In a truly touching shot, a mother and bride stand cheek to cheek. Looking towards each other, with their eyes closed, you can almost picture them swaying back and forth. While the wedding reception swirls around them, the bride and her mother seem completely isolated in their own world for a moment. Well crafted to show the environs but not to lose the importance of the emotion shared between the two.”

Top Ten Image in Brides Magazine 2009-Parents Category

Top Ten Image in Brides Magazine 2009-Parents Category

October 27, 2009 - 4:43 pm Philip Thomas - Thank you, Denise. You're very kind.

October 19, 2009 - 10:51 pm Miguel Mayo - Congratulations, amazing image!

October 19, 2009 - 1:06 pm The Wedding Lady in San Antonio - Philip, you truly are a master of the art. Your work is always outstanding. Great shot!

October 16, 2009 - 8:55 pm Erin McLarty - Congrats, Philip! It's a beautiful shot. :)

Prime Lenses

I’ve used Nikon gear since ‘94. Before that I was using Mamiya and Contax with carl zeiss lenses. Due to the expense and the fact I was, well, dirt poor, I sold that gear and moved onto Nikon. I’ve generally always had tons of lenses, from wide angles to long powerful 300mm lenses. Pretty useful when I was working on a local newspaper. Then digital came along and I upgraded all my old 35mm lenses, sold my old camera bodies for the DX format (heh, sound familiar Nikon owners). By the ealry 2000’s. I realized Canon were miles ahead and seriously considered moving over to Canon, but didn’t due to the expense, unlike some of my fellow compatriots (you know who you are).

And, that brings me to date.

I love what I do, and I’ve realized just how much I love my prime lenses, not so much the wide angle zooms or telephoto lenses. The raw simplicity of a 50mm lens, getting in close to your subject, and the fact, you have to physically move to do this, makes it an absolutely honest lens to use. Perfect for what I do today. In fact,  I was reviewing my work from the last 12 months, and realized the majority of my favorite photos were shot with a 50mm lens. Why? A multitude of reasons. Composition, available light and the unobtrusive closeness to my subject allows me to really get a honest portrayal part of the day.

This morning I just purchased a 35mm f2 lens. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll still use my 17-24mm lens, but to be honest, I usually just keep it stuck at one focal length. I’ll still use a 80-200 lens as part of my day kit, but sparingly. It’s very challenging to use this lens and tell a couples story within context. There’s nothing worse than shooting my subject, or any subject who looks alone with no context whatsoever. So, I only really use this lens  for those rather large chuches or venues where one just cannot physically get close to a couples vows.

What’s important for me as I evolve my style, is to get up close and personal to my subjects without making my subject feel self conscious or feel like I’m intruding on their space. How do I do this? It’s really about building up a open relationship with the bride and groom, making them feel comfortable and a smile on my face. I don’t hold the camera up to my nose all day ( I used too) as I want my subject to know I’m not being intrusive. I don’t shoot non-stop, trigger happy. In fact, I’ll probably shoot about 500-700 images on a wedding day, and even this feels too much. Many new photographers who have no experienced with 35mm or medium format will shoot around 1000-2000 images hoping to get great shots. That’s fine for most if you’re trying to impress your bride and groom with a numbers game, but how many of those shots will you really love?  For me, my early training was not too run out of film at the wrong time and this meant I only shot when I thought I had a great moment. With experience, I’ve grown to plan ahead and looks for shots, anticipate and react to moments . I’m still trying to cut this shooting number down and anticipate moments and much more difficult and challenging than reacting to every second. If I wanted to be trigger happy, I may as well go back to using a long lens and stand back in the corner of the room. Of course, I’m not up close all the time, I do sit back and observe. I often think of a wedding, like a stage play, You have to tell the story with establishing shots, medium and close up shots and find out who the main players are.

My philosophy and lens choice all tie in together. I love what I get to do for a living. Get close to your subject when it’s warranted, find the balance between not being intrusive and drawing attention to yourself. Use small prime lenses, less equipment, less intrusion. Smile and let folks see your face and shoot only when you see a moment. And keep the inspiration-for me it’s not learning from only wedding photographers. it’s observing and learning form the best photographers the world has seen.

All in all, easier said than done but this is what works for me. What works well for you maybe different and the clientele you’re trying to attract. Evolve your own style and try not to copy another photographers style or work as you have to be honest with yourself and find your own unique style.

~Philip

October 12, 2009 - 11:07 am shaun - I use a 24mm 1.4 and a 50mm 1.4 a LOT for my weddings. Even with the advent of the super high ISO DSLR cameras. For anything in the 35-75 range all you need is to take a step forwards or backwards! Super wide and super telephoto are a different matter though.

October 8, 2009 - 5:30 am Neil Smith - Hey Philip, I think we used to go to school together! Barnham, late 80's...? You've got some amazing shots on here. Puts my efforts to shame. Completely agree with you about prime lenses, I find myself feeling a lot more comfortable when I have to zoom with my feet! All the best, Neil

October 5, 2009 - 9:16 am admin - Hi Stephen, Thanks so much for your kind feedback and interesting comments. We're all a work in progress, right? Have a great week.How's the weather over there? It's been a year since I was there last but I'm hoping to get back next summer. Cheers! Philip

October 4, 2009 - 6:20 am Stephen Bunn - Very well put... I have been shooting weddings for just over 12 months now and while new to this and still developing a style I have to say that my lens choice is really shaping that style. Although I own a 24-70 2.8 and a 17-35 zoom, I am finding more and more I just want to leave them in my bag as I get better results with my 35mm F2. Hands down my favorite lens as it pushes me to be more creative and move more freely. That said I do feel a little uncomfortable to use it at first as I feel clients want to see big cameras mounted with flash and telephoto lens as this shouts Professional in their minds... but as we all know, thats not necessarily the case. Great work. thanks for posting your thoughts. Steve

October 1, 2009 - 5:59 am Kevin Mullins - I agree - by far my favourite lenses are the 35 and 85 primes. I still need a zoom of some sort but I think a 50mm is next on my list followed by a 24 and that's my full range then. Great post Philip. Kevin

My Post Production Workflow

Today, I’m going to share my secrets of getting great color and monochromatic images. OK, maybe not secrets, I just wrote that because I wanted your attention. Clients often tell me how much they love the final prints or albums so I thought I’d share how I get great prints for photographers and well, anyone who would like to know.

1917_DSC_1022

Album designing and preparing prints for purchase/uploading for clients are the two main areas of post production. I take great care over the final images….I want to be proud of my work plus this work is going out to clients, so of course it has to be the best.

DSC_5297I use Adobe Lightroom 2 and Photoshop CS4.  By using the simple power of droplets; the ability to convert Photoshop actions for lIghtroom use really has given me the power to really take a step up from 35mm in terms of great prints. Having send all that, I do not over photoshop prints. The actual image should be precedent for me and true moments, not obvious digital effects. The most important criteria for me in my goal for a great print, is to get the exposure right at the time of shooting. As obvious as it sounds, this is key.

I want images representing the day as accurately as possible. To aid me in reaching this goal, I use photoshop actions created by Jeff Ascough, International Award Winning Wedding Photographer.  Click here to see them.

• Import Images into Lightroom using the ‘punch’ setting
• Label favorites to keep red for black and white, green for color
• Individually assess all images to keep using brightness and contrast where applicable. I do not like over contrasty image but a slight punch. I really love to replicate the old 35mm film emulsions hence why I love to use Jeff Ascough’s recently released silver actions.
• Be sure all images selected have sharpening reduced to ‘0′. We’ll increase sharpening on the last stage before exporting for print.
• All images are then color corrected using the White Balance Selector in the Lightroom treatment box. Yes, even for black and white images images that are not color corrected will have a flat muddy look-. If you skip this step, then prints will not look good.
• General settings for my lightroom prints are all zeroed except for individually assessing each images brightness mad contrast.
• Globally, all images have recovery set to +10, vignetting Amount set to -90 and Midpoint set to +100
• Globally set all noice reduction to +20
• I then select the red label for black and white and export and copy these images to a temporary folder as tiff files, sized to 2600×2600 pixels and use the droplet action Jeffrey Ascough black and white actions. Each image is then assessed before exporting with additional brightness and contrast control in photoshop.
• The same is repeated for color with the color droplet selected.
• Once completed, I then import all the actioned images back into Lightroom with a separate folder
• Globally sharpen all the imported images to around +25
• Keyword all images before exporting to Pictage for viewing by the bride, groom, family and friends.

References:
• To create a photoshop droplet to be used in Lightroom, see these excellent tutorials from Adobe TV.

This is not a very detailed workflow as this would take several pages to fill. But, this is a process for what works for me and is all completed within one work day. Some photographers like heavy contrast, some don’t. I personally prefer to replicate the old film emulsions that I grew up using in the 80s and 90s, particularly, my favorites were the Ilford films.

I’ve also found that the built in Image Processor found in Adobe Bridge can be a bit buggy for some reason so I now use Dr.Brown’s image processor which is, I think the same terrific photoshop guy who came up with the built in version, but this version is more extensive, more powerful and, at least to me, bug free.

If you have questions or comments, add them below and I’ll do my best to answer them.

Cheers,
Philip

December 17, 2009 - 11:12 am Philip Thomas - Just to add about making a droplet in Adobe LightRoom. I though I'd expand and share with you as a photographer was asking. • First of all. Copy the actions so if you mess up, you can always go back to them. • To do this, open PhotoShop,  hold the option key (on a a mac) and drag the actions in your action palette, somewhere just below. The new actions will say (subject-copy) in the title. • Open up one of the actions you'd like to test this on. You'll have to amend one of the actions. You'll need to add 'flatten' file into each action you want to use. • To do this, open up any file, run the action, wait for it to finish, and then at the bottom of the action palette , click the red 'begin recording'  and then click the last order in the open action. Whatever you press now, will be recorded as an action. Go to 'layer' in the top PS menu, scroll down to 'flatten' image. Then click the red recording button to stop the action. All you've done is added an additional step to flatten the image. Close up the action and run a test image again. Close. • Then, highlighting the action you want to create a droplet. To do this, click file in PS, scroll down to 'automate',  'droplet'.  Choose where you want to store the droplet. It could be on your desktop for example. • In the destination, choose a location other than the original folder. I created a folder named 'Post TIFF files'.  Click suppress color profile warning. Close/Save. • Now, go to lightroom, click the export in the menu bar. Click 'add' and  'user presets', name it the same as the action your running. Choose your file settings, tiff for example. Open 'post processing' at the bottom, click in the 'after export', then click 'Go to export action folder now'.  • Drag the droplet you made earlier to the export action folder. Then back in LR, click on the droplet in the 'after export'. • Check the photos in your new export folder. A droplet can be made with any action. To save as a jpeg, you must edit the droplet and use the 'save as' command. If saving as a tiff, this is not necessary. Hope this helps to clarify a few things. If you have comments, please add them below to help others.